1. Bartoov B., Berkovitz A., Eltes F., Kogosowski A., Menezo Y., Baraky., 2002. Real time fine morphology of motile human sperm cells is associated with IVF-ICSI outcome. Journal of Andrology, 23(1): 1-8.
2. Boomsma C.M., Heineman M.J., Cohlen, B.J., Farquhar C., 2007. Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination (review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (4): CD004507.
3. Cooper T.G., Noonan E., Von E.S., Aguer T., Barker H.W., Behre H.M., Haugen T.B., 2010. World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Human Reporduction Update, 16: 231-245.
4. Dorjpurev V., Kuwahara A., Yano Y., Taniguchi T., Yamomato Y., Suto A., Tanaka Y.U., Matsuzaki T., 2011. Effect of semen characteristics on pregnancy rates following IUI. Journal of Medicine Investment, 58(1-2): 127-133.
5. Ghumman S., Adiga S.K., Upadya D., Kalthur G., Jayaraman V., 2011. Combination of swin-up and density gradient separation methods effectively eliminate DNA damaged sperm. Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association, 12(3): 148-152.
6. Hendin B.N., Falcone T., Hallak J., Nelson D.R., Vemullapalli S., Goldberg J., Thomas A.J., Agarwal A., 2000. The effect of patient and semen characteristic on live birth rate following IUI.A retrospective study. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 17(5): 245-262.
7. Hughes E.G., 1997. The effectiveness of ovulation induction and IUI in the treatment persistent infertility a meta-analysis. Human Reproduction, 12(9): 1865-1872.
8.
Ihgnait P.,
Maiti G.D.,
Pillai A.K.,
Yadav J., 2013. To compare the effectiveness of Density Gradient Centrifugation and Swin-up Wash Semen prepartion technique on the clinical outcome in Intrauterine Insemination.
Journal of Marine Medical Society, 15(2): 91-97.
9.
Lemmens L.,
Kos S.,
Beijer C.,
Brinkman J.W.,
van der Horst F.A.,
van den Hoven L.,
Kieslinger D.C.,
van Trooyen-van Vrouwerff N.J.,
Wolthuis A.,
Hendriks J.C.,
Wetzels A.M., 2016. Predictive value of sperm morphology and progressively motile sperm count for pregnancy outcome on IUI.
Fertility and Sterility, 105(6): 1462-1468.
10. Lindheim S.R., Barad D.H., Zinger M., Witt B., Amin H., Cohen B., Fisch H., Barng P., 1996. Abnormal sperm morphology is highly predictive of pregnancy outcome during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 13: 569-572
11. Mai X., Dingle X., Yeenc P., Tao D., 2018. Effects of sperm morphology and total motile spermatozoa number of the rate of pregnancy through artificial insemination. Acta Medica Mediterranea, 43: 553-587
12. Mehrafra M., Nobakhti N., Roshan Z., Dashtdar H., Hosseini A., 2003. The corrrlation between semen paramerts and pregnancy outcome after intrauterine insemination. Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 1(1): 29-33.
13. Natali II., 2011. Artifical insemination in farm animals. Capter, 7.21: 116-122
14. Ombelet W., Vandeput H., Van de putte P.G., Cox A., Janssen M., Jacobs P., Busmans E., Steeno O., Kruger T., 1997. Intauterine insemination after ovarin stimulation with clomiphene citrate: predictive potential of inseminating motile count and sperm morphology. Human Reproduction, 12: 1458-1463.
15- Pasqualtto E.B., Datichj A., Hendin B.N., Falcone T., Thomas A.J., Nelsone D.R., Agarawal A., 1999. Relationship of total motile sperm count and percentage motile sperm on successful pregnancy rates following IUI. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 16(9): 476-482.
16. Rajai F., Nasari S., Javadi M., 2017. Correlation between count and motile of sperm and age of woman with successful in outcome of IUI. Qazvin Journal of Medicine Science, 18: 22-28.
17. Smith S., Hosid S., Scott L., 1997. Use of postseparation sperm parameters to determine the method of choice for sperm preparation for assisted reproductive technology. Fertility and Sterility, 63: 591-97
18. Zhao Y., Vlahos V., Wyncott C., 2004. Impact of semen characteristics of the success of IUI. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 21(5): 143-148.
)